Zilker Metropolitan Park Vision Plan | Planning for the Future of a Timeless Place
- Award Year: 2023
- Award Category: Analysis and Planning
- Award Designation: Merit Award
- Client: City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Photography credit: Project Team: Design Workshop, Inc. (Lead Consultant); Nelson Nygaard; Siglo; Altura Solutions; Buie and Co.; CD&P; Charlie McCabe; Drenner Group; Encotech; Garza; HR&A; Kardia; Limbacher Godfrey; Majestic; Musework
Site Plan
Zilker Park has been a draw for generations of Austinites and those that lived here before. It is the home of ecological treasures, gathering spaces, play areas and home to many beloved facilities and events.
Segregation in Zilker Park, Austin, has historically created disparities in access and representation. Efforts are underway to address these issues and foster a more inclusive and equitable environment for all park users, promoting social cohesion and diversity.
The first survey of the project revealed challenges related to visitors' needs, including parking and crowding issues. The park's current natural areas and trails are beloved, but storm drainage, erosion, and inaccessible creek areas pose additional problems.
The plan’s main objective is to provide a visionary framework to direct the preservation, future improvements, and care of Zilker Park. Sustainability, accessibility, equity, nature, and history are the guiding principles. The plan incorporates recommendations from various city-adopted plans.
Although visitors today can access Zilker Park through a variety of transportation options, not all modes of travel to the park are equally convenient or safe. Because of this, most park visitors arrive via private automobile.
Zilker Park boasts a diverse and vibrant ecology, with native plant species, wildlife habitats, and natural ecosystems. The park's existing ecology serves as a valuable resource, providing opportunities for education, recreation, and ecological exploration for visitors of all ages.
Since February 2021, the team engaged the community in the Vision Planning process through over 100 pop-ups, small group discussions, virtual community meetings, surveys, and more. Despite COVID-era restrictions, meaningful community involvement has remained central throughout the two-year timeframe.
Through diverse engagement methods, the project achieved broad participation from over 5,500 individuals, receiving 8,000 comments. This equity-centered approach aimed to ensure inclusive opportunities and connect with people across Austin for a park that represents the entire community.
The City follows the International Association of Public Participation's spectrum to guide community engagement. Various outreach methods were employed by the planning team to target specific groups based on desired engagement levels, as depicted on this slide.
There are many aspects to Zilker Park, and the layering of these elements together is what produced the Vision Plan map. Those elements can be peeled apart to reveal the framework.
The plan improves pedestrian and bike circulation with a 55% increase in connected trails, three new trailheads, and five crossing points along Barton Springs Road, including a land bridge.
Ecological enhancement in Zilker Park involves repairing and restoring natural systems, increasing biodiversity with pollinator plants, enhancing climate resilience with more tree canopy, and adding 92 acres of natural area for a total of 258 acres of ecological enhancement.
The plan aligns with the Austin Climate Equity Plan by enhancing tree canopy, biodiversity, green infrastructure, and improving public transit, bike, and pedestrian access.
The plan's recommendations are divided into smaller projects for flexible implementation based on available funding. Prioritization is based on a cost/benefit analysis and community input, clustering higher benefit/lower cost projects in the top left quadrant.
The flexible project timeline is based on the cost and benefit analysis. Another important aspect is co-dependent projects, like surface parking removal, require alternative park access options (e.g., parking solutions or improved transit/shuttle services) before implementation.